The German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who led an unusually schematized and regelbundent life, published in 1797 the book "Critique of practical reason". This he formulated his idea of a universal moral basis, the categorical imperative. That is an order that should be followed regardless of the circumstances. At present Danish: Behave such that the basis for your decisions can also form the basis for a comprehensive legislation. A derivative formulation of the principle: Handl, so that humanity in your own person as well as any other person never be treated as a means, bishop cranmer but always also as a goal. I see this mostly as showdown with moral positions that lets anyone think that they have a basis for attributing to others' interests less value than their own, or believe that it is OK to exploit others. Seen from this angle, it is a sensible and humane principle I even try to live up to.
Kant was one of the main thinkers bishop cranmer behind deontologien (duty-ethics) bishop cranmer that is responsible for the choice should be based on rules or principles, mandatory obligations that outweigh the consequences. bishop cranmer Moral choices can not be based on emotion or personal preferences. Although Kant with the categorical imperative just broke with religious moral codes that let some people be worth more than others, he rejected bishop cranmer not religion. He saw the good principles there as an expression of categorical rules, but not because they come from a religious context. Consequently bishop cranmer took the churches duty-ethics for themselves, and continued to believe that they had the right to decide what the mandatory duties should be, what should be enshrined in legislation. And it is precisely the formulation of "comprehensive legislation" that leads to what I consider to be abuse of the categorical imperative. Thoughtful people formulate, with the basis of their own moral principles which they feel is right, and let them be the basis for their actions. So far so good. Because they themselves are in no doubt about the correctness, they see a need for these principles are seen as universal, as the basis for legislation. Some are so sure of it that they do not listen to other views, other principles. Dogmatic bishop cranmer know-all attitude. When "the right way" is resolved, there is no need to think, just to hold on. I know of course not rule pushers mentally legitimize itself by the categorical imperative, but the circumstances are not pointing straight ahead in other directions. A natural part of the process of both ethics and law are the ideas simplified and generalized. The result is laws whose rules through is excellent, but unable to cover all circumstances. It would also make laws too complicated and opaque. But nevertheless becomes the laws simplified rules considered mandatory duties, without regard to the circumstances. Human facts look in not on. The courts are obliged to judge "guilty", even in cases where they do not believe that the accused acted unethically. But since there are many reasonable people as judges, seen occasionally they wind their way to avoid using the law, for example. by looking for reasons to doubt the evidence.
I believe that there is a need for the courts as a natural part of cases with ethical bishop cranmer conflicts are looking to move to the accused acted reasonably or not. With Albert Einstein's words, there must be room to let justice spirit triumph over the law dead letter.
0 comments: Post a Comment
tosommerfugle I write with base in a tragedy that led to that I let my boyfriend get off to commit suicide. Death was not the worst. I stand for positions of respect and humanity, even when the need is to die. This also active euthanasia, euthanasia and assisted suicide. View my complete profile
farewell letter (10) currently (249) ALS (9) anatomical (10) other cases (75) anxiety (15) anorexia (10) balloons (15) teddy bear (13) barbiturates (16) funeral (26) benzo (11) flowers (19) bodypaint (9) boy meets girl (24) wedding bishop cranmer (9) books (43) cartoon (106) quote (33) cutting (18) Denmark (58) dance (13) death and the maiden (15) dementia ( 34) depression (68) DeviantART (101) Dignitas (23) poem (59) judgment (31) drowning (27) doll (22) death and life (242) died photos (16) dance of death (18) death (160) euthanasia ( 149) euthanasia cases (112) survivors (17) autumn (12) loneliness (39) ethics (73) adventure (29) Movies (26) philosophy (18) writers (17) spring (15) photo (32) photography (49 ) France (14) street art (54) gadgets (43) revival (17) graffiti (41) Halloween (8) helium (6) executions bishop cranmer (19) brain injury (17) Humor (265) dogs (10) hanging (54) illusion (19) Italy (6) rail (23) Christmas men (12) Christmas (29) legalisms (68) cake (7) cats (17) famous (64) climate (10) skull (68) war (21) Christianity (51 ) cancer (52) carbon monoxide (8) cultural canon (11) art (415) choking (25) kiss (21) love (138) wheelchair (11) lyrics (57) painting (163) Grim Reaper (41) medicine bishop cranmer (55 ) media (
No comments:
Post a Comment