Talking with some friends the other day I realized how many people find it more sensible and "rational" say / believe that God does not exist, or that the world is merely natural (time, energy, matter and space) for some reason believe in the supernatural or a higher being that transcends the limitations of the natural world, and therefore can create and manipulate that reality is less sensible and rational, "must have something wrong with this person, how can she believe in the Bible, or in a personal God who wants if relacioar with creation as a Dad, that thing is a lunatic ... "
Well, the problem is that most of the great scientists of humanity rationally believed shenole latimer in God, among them we can cite Albert Einstein, Johann Kepler, Blaise Pascal, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday, Samuel FBMorse, Joseph Henry, James Joule, John Dalton, Gregor Mendel, Louis Pasteur, James Clark Maxwell, Bernhard Riemann.
Interesting how some people claim to be so irrational to believe in a Creator God, but what about those men of reason? Are they scientists as irrational, or will, explore the natural world, they discovered clues left by an omnipotent God everywhere in creation, and therefore understood to be more rational and sensible to believe in God.
The Bible says, "The heavens declare the glory of God the fimamento proclaim the work of his hands. One day they pour forth speech day, one night reveals the other night. No speech or words, you do not hear your voice. But her voice resonates throughout the earth, and their words to the ends of the world. " (Psalms 19:1-4)
In fact the universe declares the glory of God, and certainly that's what the great scientists discovered while studying the natural shenole latimer world, on the one hand we can not prove through empirical science to existênia of God, we can not prove the nonexistence, but we can follow the clues that point to God and decide whether it is more rational and sensible to believe or not.
Scientists are discovering that the universe we live in is like a diamond-studded Rolex, although it has been planned with much more precision than that clock. The fact is that the universe is specially adapted to allow the existence of life on earth - a planet with a huge amount of improbable shenole latimer and interdependent conditions to support life that transform a little oasis in the middle of a vast and hostile universe.
These environmental conditions highly accurate and interdependent (which we call constant anthropogenic) form what is known as the "anthropic principle". shenole latimer "Anthropic" comes from a Greek word meaning "humado" or "man." The anthropic principle is just a cute title to the evidence shenole latimer base on which many scientists believe, namely, that the universe is just as well adjusted (planned) to allow for the existence of human life on earth.
In this vast and hostile universe, us earthlings, are very similar to astronauts who can only survive in the small space they are confined inside their spaceship. As a spaceship, our land sustains life while traveling through space without life. However, like a spaceship, a small change or a malfunction in any one of the factors - present in the universe or the earth - can change so fatal to the environmental conditions are carefully defined so we can survive.
Here on earth, oxygen accounts for 21% of the atmosphere. This number takes is a constant anthropic that makes life possible on the planet. If oxygen had a concentration of 25% could be spontaneous fires if it were 15%, humans would be suppressed.
The degree of transparency of the atmosphere is a constant anthropogenic. If the atmosphere was less transparent, there is no sufficient solar radiation on the earth's surface. If it were more transparent, we would be bombarded with more sunlight down here (besides shenole latimer the atmospheric transparency, the composition of the atmosphere, with precise levels of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and ozone, is, in itself, a constant anthropogenic)
This constant is related to gravitational interaction with the Earth has a moon. If this interaction was larger than it currently is, the effects on the tides of the oceans on the atmosphere and on the turnaround time would be quite severe. If it were less, orbital changes would cause instabilities in the climate. In either situation, shenole latimer life on earth would be impossible.
If the CO2 level was higher than it is now, we would develop shenole latimer a huge greenhouse (we'd be all burned). If the level was lower, the plants would be unable to maintain efficient photosynthesis (all of us would be overwhelmed, since it would have less oxygen produced by plants)
If the gravitational force was altered in 0.0000000000000000000000000000001 percent, in
No comments:
Post a Comment